Printer-Friendly View

Method Summary

Method Source Micrology Laboratories L.L.C.
Method NumberEasygel
Revision Information1999
Method NameDescriptive Name: E. coli and other coliform bacteria by Coliscan Easygel method

Official Name: Detection of waterborne coliforms and E. coli with Coliscan Easygel

MediaMedia: WATER
SubcategoryMicrobiological
Citation Detection of waterborne coliforms and E coli with Coliscan Easygel
Method DownloadThis is a proprietary method.
Please visit the method owner's site for method documentation
Summary of MethodPreferred approach for all water samples (ideally 1 to 5 mL): a sample may be dispensed into the presterilized liquid medium and the mixture poured into a pretreated petri plate. Gelling occurs within 45 min. [Alternative approach: Presterilized liquid medium (13 mL/bottle for one plate) is poured into a pretreated (supplied with medium) petri plate and allowed to gel on a level surface. The solid surface may then be innoculated.] Gelled plates are incubated at a temperature of 35 C for 24 h. The presence of pink colonies is indicative of coliforms and blue/purple colonies is indicative of E. coli. Innoculum added to the liquid medium is limited to a maximum of 5 mL. Requirements: a low power (10 - 15 magnification) binocular wide-field dissecting microscope of equivalent may be necessary to provide optimal viewing of the colonies.
Scope and Applicationambient monitoring: all water: surface water, ground water, waste effluents
Applicable Concentration Range20 - 80 CFU/100 mL is considered ideal for enumeration. Maximum: 200 CFU/100 mL; dilution is required for samples that exceed this level.
InterferencesAeromonas may yield a positive coliform reaction under certain conditions, such as if one of the inhibitors in the medium is eliminated through adverse storage or outdating. Aeromonas does not interfere with E. coli determination. Sources of interference in MF methods (USEPA Fed Reg Aug. 2001): high turbidity, toxic compounds, or large numbers of non-coliform (background) bacteria, and organisms damaged by chlorine or toxic compounds.
QC Requirements(Standard Methods, 20th ed., Section 9020 B8 and B9). Testing should be conducted on every lot of reagent with a known positive and negative strain.
Sample HandlingChill samples, 1oC to 4oC. Techniques for collection: Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th Edition. L. Clesceri, A. Greenberg, and A. Eaton (editors). APHA: Washington, DC. 1998. Section 9060A
Sample processing time: greater than 10 minutes. To minimize interferences causing underestimation of organism density in MF methods (USEPA Fed Reg Aug. 2001): replicates of smaller sample dilutions/volumes may be filtered and the results combined.
Max Holding TimeSample should be analyzed within 6 h after sampling and within 2 h from receipt of sample in lab for compliance or 24 h for routine monitoring (Standard Methods, 20th ed., Section 9060B); however, a 6 h holding time for all samples is highly recommended (Myers and Sylvester, 1997).
Relative Cost/EffortLess than $50
Sample Prep Method(s) 
 

Method E. coli and other coliform bacteria by Coliscan Easygel method has 2 analytes associated with it.

Analyte


Detection
Level


Bias Precision Pct False
Positive
E. coli
(68583-22-2)
1 CFU/100 mLN/AN/A 
Total coliforms
(E761700)
1 CFU/100 mLN/AN/A 
export_analytes
Precision Descriptor NotesAeromonas can yield false positives for coliform test under certain conditions, such as if one of the inhibitors in the medium is eliminated through adverse storage or outdating. Aeromonas does not interfere with E. coli determination. Deutsch, W. Comparative study of Coliscan Easygel and Standard Methods media in the enumeration and differentiation of E. coli and coliforms in river waters in Alabama. Unpublished study. Roth, J. N. Comparative studies of Coliscan Easygel and Standard Methods media for enumeration and differentiation of E. coli in coliforms in river water and treated wastewater effluents. General comments (USEPA Fed Reg Aug. 2001): Membrane filter (MF) methods are generally more precise in enumerating target organisms than MPN tests. Based on susceptibility to interferences, MF tests may underestimate the number of viable bacteria.
Detection Level NoteDetermined by using the largest volume, and the lowest number of organisms that can be counted. For example, if 5 mL was the largest volume, the detection would be 1 CFU/5 mL or 20 CFU/100 mL.
 
Close Window